Europe is facing an historic moment. By the end of this year, the number
of people applying for asylum in the European Union will exceed one
million. The human cost of this refugee crisis is appalling. Yet, in all
but a handful of cases, the response of Europe’s governments has been
tentative, at best: acknowledging the need to do more, while fearing the
implications.
The second challenge is to start the
process of integrating refugees into Europe’s societies and economies.
Some refugees will find it relatively easy to find jobs. A
university-educated Syrian civil engineer arriving in Munich will need
to learn some German; but, once this is done, he or she is unlikely to
have to wait too long before employers come knocking. Other
asylum-seekers have lower levels of education, and many may well be
traumatized by their experience of war and exodus. It will take time and
effort to integrate them
and many voters will be skeptical of the process, especially given that successful integration or assimilation will not come cheap.
Read more: We Should Not Be Afraid Of Refugees » Social Europe
Some politicians fear the burden that
migrants will impose on local communities and taxpayers. Others fear
extremists masquerading as genuine refugees. Above all, many are scared
of public opinion, which – for all the heart-warming scenes of welcome
and support for asylum-seekers – remains hesitant and even hostile to
the prospect of still more migrants from war-torn, troubled countries,
especially if they practice a different religion.
European leaders cannot afford to be
afraid. The refugee crisis is not one from which they can opt out. No
magic wand will empower leaders to transport more than a million people
back across the Aegean and the Bosphorus to Mosul and Aleppo, or across
the Mediterranean to Eritrea, Somalia, and Sudan.
The reintroduction of border controls
and the construction of fences may buy time for over-stretched
countries, but no one can seriously expect to keep out people who are so
desperate to move. Given the dire conditions in the countries from
which they are fleeing, perhaps half of the asylum-seekers will qualify
for
residency under even the strictest
rules. So, whatever the sensitivity or ambivalence of public opinion,
European leaders will have to find a bold, coordinated, and unified
response.
There are three challenges. The first is
to agree on a fair allocation of refugees within Europe; despite their
vast numbers, these desperate people must be provided with shelter,
food, and support. This will be difficult enough.
and many voters will be skeptical of the process, especially given that successful integration or assimilation will not come cheap.
However, paying the price to accept and
integrate today’s asylum-seekers could reap significant benefits for the
Europe of tomorrow. Our work at the OECD shows that migration, if well
managed, can spur growth and innovation. Unfortunately, in the past,
migration has not always been well managed: migrants have been
concentrated in ghetto-like conditions, with few public services or
employment prospects.
Note EU-Digest: this is a renewed opportunity for Europe to do migration right - we should not blow it this time.
Read more: We Should Not Be Afraid Of Refugees » Social Europe