|
The Press: Say not, See Not, Hear Not |
It is amazing listening to news stations during any
terrorist attack. They report "blow by blow" all the gruesome and
horrific details endlessly.
CNN in particular, turns
these sad events into an endless nauseating soap opera with infinite and
at times totally insignificant detail.
Questions are asked about why the most wanted man in Europe was able
to elude the police for so long, even though he was living in his home
district of Molenbeek in Brussels.
Television and newspapers ask
nervously about the chances of Isis carrying out another atrocity aimed
at dominating the news agenda and showing that it is still in business.
The reporting of the events in Brussels is in keeping with that after
the January (Charlie Hebdo) and November Paris attacks and the Tunisian
beach killings by
Isis
last year, or the killings in Ankara and Istanbul
For several days there is blanket coverage by the media as
it allocates time and space far beyond what is needed to relate
developments. But then the focus shifts abruptly elsewhere and
Isis becomes yesterday’s story, treated as if the movement has ceased to exist or at least lost its capacity to affect our lives.
The outpouring of official grief that commonly follows any atrocity, such
as the march of 40 world leaders through the streets of Paris after the
Charlie Hebdo killings last year, is used to help neuter any idea that the
political failures of these same leaders might be to a degree
responsible for the slaughter.
After all, such marches are usually held
by the powerless to protest and show defiance, but in this case the
march simply serves as a publicity stunt to divert attention from these
leaders’ inability to act effectively and stop the wars in the Middle
East which they had done much to provoke.
But it its not only the US which deserves the blame. By taking up the cause of the Syrian and Libyan opposition and
destroying the Syrian and Libyan states, France and Britain opened the
door to
Isis and should share in the blame for the rise of
Isis, terrorism and creating the refugee crises in Europe.
By refusing to admit to or learn from past
mistakes, the West Europeans did little to lay the basis for the
current, surprisingly successful “cessation of hostilities” in Syria,
which is now considered by the public at large almost entirely as a Russian achievement.
Once
again the question can be asked - which major News Agency has shown the
courage to sit down with any important political leader and ask them
some serious investigative questions, like: "why have you made such a
mess in the Middle East , or, "what is being done to stop weapon dealers
from selling their weapons and munition around the world at will ", or,
"how come the former US Bush Administration is not taken into a
criminal court for war crimes ", or, "why is the West propping up the
Egyptian military dictatorship, or, "why is the military industrial
complex industry selling weapons and aircraft to despotic and
undemocratic nations like Saudi-Arabia, Egypt, Iraq and Somalia", or,
"why can't the UN declare the Middle East region a nuclear free zone",
or, "what are the requirements to be a member of NATO, when we see that
one of their member states (TURKEY) does not respect freedom of the
Press, throws investigative reporters in jail or takes over newspapers when they don't follow the party line" - and the list goes on and on.
Barton
Gellman of the Washington Post says that for journalists just getting
basic information from any governmen tagency has become very difficult:
“Besides the actual risk of prosecution . . . there’s an investigative
issue that very much relates to the ability to do national security
journalism now. Almost everything you want to write about these days, if
you are
writing about diplomacy, or intelligence, or defense, is classified;
everything indeed, except the boiler plate press release and the tightly
controlled news conference, is classified."
Unfortunately, that is just the way how most governments operate these days. Today there is more
classified information which can not be accessed than there is open-source information on the
planet.”
Bottom-line, political clarity and honesty is a
"Fata Morgana" when it comes to getting it from Governments.
Consequently distinguishing "fiction" today is the new reality.
Almere-Digest