![]()  | 
| The Port of Rotterdam | 
Transporting
 containers across most of Europe from northern ports is currently 
cheaper and more sustainable than via southern ports such as Koper, 
Genoa and Constanta despite their shorter transit times to Asia, 
Panteia, a consultancy said.
The northern ports will 
become even more competitive as Europe seeks to reduce the environmental
 impact of supply chains, according to the report commissioned by the 
Rotterdam Port Authority and Deltalinqs, a Dutch industry association.
“The Northern European ports perform well because many large container vessels
 call here and much of the hinterland transport is done by inland 
shipping and rail. This provides for a relatively small ecological 
footprint” said Allard Castelein, chief executive officer of the 
Rotterdam Port Authority.
“The report also shows that 
further improvement is possible, especially by using LNG (liquefied 
natural gas) as a transport fuel and making logistics more efficient 
through IT. These are two important challenges for the coming years.”
Mega-ships
 with capacities of up to 20,000 twenty-foot-equivalent units, which 
have much lower carbon dioxide emissions per container than 10,000 TEU 
ships, call more frequently at northern hubs than at the smaller 
southern European ports “because more goods are shipped to and from this
 densely populated region.”
The report concludes that 
imposing a Sulphur Emission Control Area, currently restricted to the 
North Sea, the English Channel and the Baltic Sea, to the Mediterranean 
will not impact the market share of European ports.
The 
major shippers and logistics firms interviewed by Panteia said price was
 the most important factor in choosing ports followed by service and 
reliability, with sustainability not seen as an important criterion.
“Sustainability is a deal maker, but not a deal breaker, yet,” the Rotterdam Port Authority said.
The Panteia report contrasts with the findings of a recent study by Drewry Supply Chain Advisors that said the traditional gateway ports in Northwest Europe no longer hold all of the trump cards on the Asian container trades.
The
 cheapest option to ship a container from China to southern Germany was 
via Rotterdam and Hamburg, but only by a margin of $150 and $100, 
respectively, against Koper in Slovenia, which has a three-day transit 
time advantage.
“As such we believe Shanghai-to-Munich 
via Koper is a true Best-Route contender for shippers with time 
sensitive cargoes,” Drewry said.
Southern European ports
 will also become more attractive as freight rates to the Mediterranean,
 which have traditionally been higher than those to northern Europe, 
have recently become cheaper than those on the longer haul.
South
 European intermodal operators are also developing “exciting and 
competitive” concepts that will be boosted when the trans-Alpine 
Gotthard rail tunnel opens in June.
“More shippers will 
look to route via southern gateway ports as the maritime price 
differential equalizes and intermodal connectivity improves,” Drewry 
said.
While Rotterdam, Europe’s top container hub, is 
bullish about its ability to see off the challenge from upcoming 
southern European ports, other northern gateways are less confident of 
maintaining their market share.
Antwerp recently urged 
Rotterdam, its closest rival, to join forces to meet the challenge of 
China’s growing investment in the southern European waterfront that 
could lure container traffic from the Le Havre-Hamburg range.
The
 two ports could build joint storage facilities for Asian cargo bound 
for central and Eastern Europe, the Belgian port’s CEO Eddy Bruyninckx 
suggested. “We each play our part, but it would be wise to join forces 
to ship goods to Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary,” he told Dutch 
newspaper Financieelle Dagblad.
“China wants to lessen 
its dependence on northern European ports,” Frans Paul van der Pullen, 
an analyst at the Clingendeal Institute, told the paper.
“China
 will eventually be able to ship products to central Europe more quickly
 via southern ports than through Rotterdam or Antwerp.”

